Saturday, 23 February 2013

THE VALLEY OF ASHES

Why is the Valley of Ashes important in The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald?

Let’s look at how Fitzgerald uses the Valley of Ashes to establish tone and purpose, to create meaning. 


Tone

At the beginning of chapter two, Nick Carraway describes the Valley of Ashes using negative diction, including “grotesque gardens,” “ash-gray men,” “solemn dumping ground,” and “paintless days” (21), to create a gloomy, unsettling and hopeless tone. Creating a dark and hopeless tone, evokes dark and gloomy images from the reader and enables the reader to picture a corrupt atmosphere and setting fit for the immoral events that occur in the Valley of Ashes, including the murder of Myrtle Wilson. The use of the diction, “impenetrable cloud,” “spasms of bleak dust,”  “rising smoke,” and “powdery air” (21), also accentuates the dismal tone of the novel, by enabling the reader to picture the waste, pollution and moral decay that is hidden behind the wealthy and extravagant facades of both East Egg and West Egg.

How does the tone create meaning?

At the beginning of chapter two, Nick Carraway’s description of the Valley of Ashes is structured into paragraphs. The first paragraph describes the physical features of the valley, whereas the second paragraph of chapter two introduces the symbol of the eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg. The narrator describes how the eyes of Eckleburg “brood on over the solemn dumping ground,” through a pair of “enormous yellow spectacles” (21). Fitzgerald uses a metaphor to refer to the Valley of Ashes as a “solemn dumping ground,” to highlight how the valley represents the moral and social decay of the wealthy. Likewise, the colour yellow of the spectacles represents the decayed moral values, during the Jazz Age era. Since Gatsby’s Rolls Royce is also the colour yellow, the colour yellow can also represent death, due to the fact that Gatsby’s yellow car kills Myrtle Wilson in the Valley of Ashes.

The Valley of Ashes is also a geographical symbol in which decayed moral values are practiced. For example, Tom Buchanan is free to publicize his relationship with Myrtle in the Valley of Ashes. However, in East Egg, Tom Buchanan keeps his affair with Myrtle hidden.

 
Purpose

Now let’s discuss the purpose of the Valley of Ashes.

Through the use of literary techniques, Fitzgerald develops the dismal tone and atmosphere of the Valley of Ashes. Fitzgerald uses a simile when he makes a comparison of the Valley of Ashes to “a fantastic farm where ashes grow like wheat into ridges and hills and grotesque gardens” (21). The use of the word, “ashes,” has negative connotations because ashes are associated with death. Moreover, associating the Valley of Ashes with death develops the novel’s plot, by foreshadowing the death of Myrtle Wilson in chapter seven of the novel. Fitzgerald also uses the literary technique of juxtaposition, when he describes the Valley of Ashes as a place in which ashes grow into “grotesque gardens.” By placing the words, “grotesque” and “gardens” beside each other, Fitzgerald creates a contrast. Gardens have a positive connotation, whereas the word “grotesque,” is associated with a repulsive, ugly and distorted image and therefore a negative implication, which emphasizes the dismal and hopeless tone of the novel.

One of the main purposes of the Valley of Ashes is to contrast the valley with East Egg and West Egg. At the beginning of chapter one, the narrator describes East Egg and West Egg as home of the wealthy and the “well-to-do people” (6). During Nick Carraway’s stay in West Egg, Nick describes Gatsby’s extravagant parties, using vivid imagery and he appeals to the reader’s senses. For example, at Gatsby’s house party in chapter three, Nick states, “The air is alive with chatter and laughter,” and “The lights grow brighter as the earth lurches away from the sun, and now the orchestra is playing yellow cocktail music. Laughter is easier minute by minute…tipped out at a cheerful word” (34). The sound of laughter and chatter appeals to the reader’s sense of sound and the use of positive diction, including “cheerful,” “alive” and “brighter,” creates a blissful atmosphere, which contrasts the dreary tone in the Valley of Ashes. Unlike East Egg and West Egg, the Valley of Ashes is where the moral corruption of both Eggs are hidden. Therefore, the Valley of Ashes emphasizes the theme of the decline of the American Dream in the 1920’s, and how the 1920’s was an era in which moral and social corruption was prominent.

Another purpose of the Valley of Ashes is to develop the characters in the novel and to develop the novel’s plot.
 
So what does this mean?

Fitzgerald uses the Valley of Ashes to compare the rich with the poor. The characters who live in the Valley of Ashes, including George Wilson and Myrtle Wilson, contrast the characters that live in East Egg, including Tom Buchanan and Daisy Buchanan. When the reader is first introduced to Daisy Buchanan’s character, Fitzgerald describes Daisy with “bright eyes” and a “bright passionate mouth” (11), to highlight her innocence. Contrarily, Fitzgerald introduces Myrtle Wilson to the reader, after the description of the Valley of Ashes in chapter two. Since the Valley of Ashes represents the moral decay of the society during the Jazz Age era, introducing Myrtle Wilson, following the Valley of Ashes, is appropriate because she is the epitome of the corruption and ugliness hidden by the beautiful facades of both East Egg and West Egg. When Nick Carraway first meets Myrtle in chapter two, he describes her as “Tom Buchanan’s mistress” (21) who has a “thickish figure of a woman [that] blocked out the light from the office door” (23). Nick also states how Myrtle was “faintly stout,” but “carried her flesh sensuously” (23). The physical description of Myrtle therefore contrasts Daisy’s dainty and pure description. Since the reader associates sensuality as a form of moral corruption, Myrtle is a representation of the moral corruption in The Great Gatsby.

Sunday, 4 March 2012

Are Men & Women Really As Different As They Are Perceived To Be?

In this blog, I will be exploring three common linguistic differences between men and women, including the stereotypes involving swearing and taboo language, the assumption that women talk more than men and complimenting.

Stereotype #1: Swearing and taboo language

It is often argued that men make more use of vulgar language than women, whereas women make use of more polite and refined language. The expectation of how a woman was to act in the past is quite different from the expectation of a woman today.

Women were previously thought to have a polite use of language to emphasize how they “ought to talk.” The avoidance of swearing and vulgar language was the aim of the ideal female because a woman whose behaviour was perceived as aggressive would not be meeting the “expectations of cultural femininity,” which included the role of being polite and nurturing. That is to say that swearing was considered to be of aggressive nature and of masculine identity. Women could either make use of refined and polite language, or they could remain silence, which was a sign of obedience to the status quo of that time. As an English proverb states, “Silence is the best ornament of a woman.”

From the past to present, there has been a constant increase in the number of women using profane language in public. In 1996, 67 percent of men, compared to 33 percent of women used profanity in public. In 2006, 55 percent of males and 45 percent of females were reported to swear in public. What does this all mean? It means that our culture today has become more accepting and lenient to the expectations of women, in this case, women’s use of swear words and profanity. An example of the increase of taboo language in women can be heard in the workplace, as women become more competitive in this field. Women’s use of vulgar language often increases when working alongside men. Although our culture has changed and will continue to change in the future, cultures differ from one another in what is acceptable of women and what is not. In cultures where women do not have equal rights, women must refrain from using inappropriate vulgar language because it is considered the property of men.

Stereotype #2: Women talk more than men

Is the presumption true that women talk more than men? I believe that this presumption is false. Depending on the situation, women or men can talk more than the other. Women can be considered to talk more and to dominate in “domestic interactions,” involving relationships between friends and family. However, men can be considered to talk more than women and achieve dominance in other contexts, including sports, gadgets and in the work environment, such as in staff meetings and in seminars.

When deciding whether men or women talk more, we should take the circumstance and the social context into account. Does the circumstance involve women talking to other women, men talking to other men, or does it involve women and men talking to each other? Interruptions are also an important factor to consider because it is a strategy used to deprive someone the right to speak. In other words, interruptions can determine whether men or women talk more. Nicola Woods, a linguist, completed a study in which she found that men “used interruptions as a way of getting the floor” and that they succeeded in achieving dominance in conversation 85% of the time. Even when women are in a position of higher-status than men, men almost always achieve in talking more than women, in the form of interruption. For example, in a study involving two interviews on Australian TV, completed by fellow linguist Joanne Winter, it was shown that in the first interview, the male interviewer held dominance throughout his interview with a female interviewee, by interrupting his female interviewee often and therefore talking more, whereas in the second interview, the female interviewer did not hold dominance throughout her interview with her male interviewee, due to the fact that her male interviewee interrupted her often and therefore talked more. 

Stereotype #3 Complimenting

Is it true that women give and receive more compliments than men? I believe that this stereotype is partially true. In same-gender complimenting, women give out compliments habitually towards one another. When women compliment each other, they make personal compliments on appearance, whereas men do not compliment each other on appearance, but rather on possessions and on ability and performance. When complimenting each other, women also tend to use a larger variety of adjectives than men.

Examples:

A compliment given by a woman to another woman: “You look lovely today. The new mascara you are wearing really brings out the colour of your gorgeous eyes!”

A compliment given by a man to another man: “You played great in the hockey tournament.”

The adjectives used by the woman, “lovely” and “gorgeous” are much more complex than the adjective used by the man “great.”

Contrarily, in mixed gender complimenting, women give fewer compliments to men, whereas men give more compliments to women. Women do not give compliments habitually towards men, as they do to each other because they are afraid of being interpreted as “too forward” and “romantically assertive.” This might be considered as culturally unacceptable in our society today. Since men are more forward, they therefore give more compliments to women. Complimenting women would be considered culturally acceptable because men are usually portrayed as the initiator when involving romantic situations and when showing interest in a woman.

Bibliography

Coates, Jennifer. Women, Men And Language. Malaysia. Pearson Education 1986, 1993, 2004.

What Language Barrier? Oxford University Press. The Guardian 1 Oct. 2007.

Steward, Penelope. “Male & Female Differences in Swearing and Taboo Language.”Ehow. (3 May 2011). 5 par. Online.

Stapleton, Karyn. “Gender and Swearing: A Community Practice.” Questia. (2003). 5 par. Online.http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qst?docId=5002066468 2 Mar 2012.

Monday, 31 October 2011

Speed 2: Cruise Control

Speed 2…Is it possible?

 To begin, many scenes in Speed 2 seemed staged and inaccurate. Some examples include:
  • How the ship was only submerged in less than a meter under water
  • How the magnitude of the people traveling on the ship was inaccurate according to a mathematical viewpoint, unless the floor's surface was extremely slippery
  • How the ship took significantly longer to come to a complete stop in the movie...Since the ship was decelerating by -0.2 m/s, it should have come to a complete stop in 18 seconds.
As misleading as some of the scenes in the movie were, I believe that it is possible that the strong deceleration of the ship caused people to slide forward and two of the main characters to get thrown through the ship’s glass windows.

According to the free body diagram I created, the inertia force- the force that pulled the people on the ship forward, was greater than the friction force. Therefore, the inertia force was so strong that it caused the people on the ship to slide forward.  
     

 The inertia/ applied force acting on the people on the ship is greater than the friction force.





Since we know that the average weight of a man is 77 kg, we can find the net force (sum of all forces).

FN = m x a
FN = 77 x 9.8
FN = 755 N

Using our found net force, we can then find coefficient of friction.

FF = u x FN
FF = 755N
755= u x 4
188.75 = u     --> coefficient of Friction

From these calculations, we can conclude that the inertia force acting on the people was greater than the friction force. Therefore, it is possible that the deceleration of the ship was so strong that it caused people to slide forward and two of the main characters to get thrown through the ship’s glass windows.

Tuesday, 11 October 2011

Physics and Pennies

Have you ever thought of how you can cheat in a Penny Knuckle game? Well the answer is simple. It’s PHYSICS- the kinematic motion of an object. You don’t have to cheat. You can win fairly by using a mathematical equation! Using equations gives you an accurate answer each time. 

First, measure the length of the surface you are going to push the penny on, such as a table.  Next, acquire a penny and a stopwatch. Place the penny on the end of the table and find an object that can get the penny to travel from one end of the table to the other, such as a textbook. Using your stopwatch, measure the amount of time it takes for the penny to travel across the table. Record your results.

Initial Velocity of a Penny Lab
Vf= 0 m/s        D= 1.835 m      T= 1.08 s

D= ½ (Vf + Vi) x t
1.835= ½ (0 + Vi) x 1.08
1.835/1.08= ½ Vi
1.694= ½ Vi
3.39 m/s = Vi

The motion of the textbook pushing the penny (the textbook’s initial velocity), must be the same each time, in order to get accurate results. Since we knew that the distance of the table was 1.835 meters, the final velocity of the penny was 0 m/s and the time it took for the penny to travel from one end of the table to the other end was 1.08 seconds, we used these measurements and plugged them into the equation (D= ½ (Vf + Vi) x t) to find the initial velocity needed to push the penny across the table, which was 3.39 m/s.


Wasn't that easy?